Re: [PATCH] Simple code cleanup in tuplesort.c.

From: Xing Guo <higuoxing(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simple code cleanup in tuplesort.c.
Date: 2023-01-09 12:29:23
Message-ID: CACpMh+AGTmDoOKXdZd80Rq1HDAjnTe-oZGuz6hKVzOj8Q-Hcvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/9/23, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 8:18 AM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> The label TSS_BUILDRUNS has a similar style and also the following
> comment, so I will push this patch with a similar comment added unless
> someone wants to make a case for doing otherwise.
>>
>> * Note that mergeruns sets the correct state->status.
>
> This has been pushed, thanks. Note that both patches in this thread have
> the same name. Adding a version number to the name is a good way to
> distinguish them.

Thank you John. This is my first patch, I'll keep it in mind that
adding a version number next time I sending the patch.

> --
> John Naylor
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

--
Best Regards,
Xing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) 2023-01-09 12:44:12 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2023-01-09 12:29:05 Re: MERGE ... RETURNING