Re: recent deadlock regression test failures

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recent deadlock regression test failures
Date: 2017-04-07 18:35:33
Message-ID: CACjxUsPQ-mApyYqLvp+68bTJ6DLw1u=gmdxeMydstK1qQSE9XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> I'd rather fix the issue, than remove the tests entirely. Seems quite
> possible to handle blocking on Safesnapshot in a similar manner as pg_blocking_pids?

I'll see what I can figure out.

--
Kevin Grittner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Palmiotto 2017-04-07 18:36:29 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-07 18:33:47 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6