| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
| Date: | 2017-06-15 21:28:10 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsOQw=vYjPWZQ29GmgWU8ZKj336OGiNQX5Z2W-AcV12+Nw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> As far as I understand her proposal, it is exactly the opposite -- if a
> transaction fails, it is discarded. And this P.S. note is asking
> whether this is a good idea, or would we prefer that failing
> transactions are retried.
>
> I think it's pretty obvious that transactions that failed with
> some serializability problem should be retried.
Agreed all around.
--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-15 21:42:38 | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-15 21:22:08 | Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |