Re: Allow parallelism for deferrable serializable txns

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow parallelism for deferrable serializable txns
Date: 2018-09-20 20:54:07
Message-ID: CACjxUsMkgisdfTuep0EqdA7fa7BP4Ej+eFB+Bnd1VsqLzAjPxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> afaict for deferrable READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transactions we could
> trivially allow parallelism? Am I missing something?

I think you are right. What's more, DEFERRABLE transactions seem very
likely to be cases where parallelism would be especially beneficial.

Will take care of it.

--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2018-09-20 21:03:15 Re: [patch] Support LLVM 7
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2018-09-20 20:13:41 Re: [patch] Support LLVM 7