| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
| Date: | 2016-03-30 19:46:24 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsMQctYnwJi62BzrBY-773fuGWRcOJKgfPthuKkVpAvHow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> [Does the patch allow dangling page pointers?]
> Again, I don't want to prejudice anyone against your patch, which I
> haven't read.
I don't believe that the way the patch does its business opens any
new vulnerabilities of this type. If you see such after looking at
the patch, let me know.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-30 19:50:21 | large regression for parallel COPY |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2016-03-30 19:34:31 | Very small patch for decode.c |