| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Detecting SSI conflicts before reporting constraint violations |
| Date: | 2016-04-07 16:20:24 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsMHZYUc5o-dommjgMs7i7RznBRFD287ULjMf6veh1DrOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a version that includes an attempt to describe the
> situation in the documentation.
Pushed with minor adjustments to the docs. Mostly I thought your
new text was more appropriate as just another paragraph than as a
"note". The previous paragraph was a little imprecise and was in
some conflict with the new one, so I adjusted that a little, too.
Nice work! I sure wish we had spotted that a one-line check there
would have covered so much when the feature was first added.
I understand there is considerable feeling that this should be
back-patched, but I have not done that pending a clear consensus on
the point, since it is a user-visible behavioral change.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-04-07 16:37:39 | Re: pg_ctl promote wait |
| Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2016-04-07 16:01:42 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |