Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries

From: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries
Date: 2026-07-14 08:44:25
Message-ID: CACiT8iaih3UnYXyTahQ-4Lz4L2p4epGKAFAd+R8QKA+LkM3zcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for the review, Daniel.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:36 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> Given the likelihood of an issue in backbranches, we could also only apply for
> v19 and leave the backbranches.
>

I'm okay with that too.

Best regards,
Karina Litskevich
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Xing Guo 2026-07-14 08:52:03 [PATCH v1] plpython: Pair SPI_connect and SPI_finish in the same function
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-07-14 08:35:37 Re: Grab bag of smaller OpenSSL fixups