Re: Avoid unused value (src/fe_utils/print.c)

From: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: marko(at)joh(dot)to, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoid unused value (src/fe_utils/print.c)
Date: 2023-07-28 08:53:09
Message-ID: CACiT8iaOA0JZT87fqdSkeRR3R0y0hqUEbcu-o-eF0RvbD_SJYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:04 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Checked today, Coverity does not complain about need_recordsep.
>

Great! Thanks.
So v2 patch makes Coverity happy, and as for me doesn't make the code
less readable. Does anyone have any objections?

Best regards,
Karina Litskevich
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2023-07-28 08:55:52 Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off
Previous Message Yuya Watari 2023-07-28 08:49:04 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions