Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david(at)fetter(dot)org, stark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-01-06 23:49:04
Message-ID: CAC_2qU-2WWz+3LL6TDUmrYW0pnEJ=Fw=Vm_U85RoUD_H9ugNkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:

> I think I've said it before, but I'm guessing OLTP style database
> rarely have pages written that are dirty that aren't covered by real
> changes (so have the FPW anyways) and OLAP type generally freeze after
> loads to avoid the hint-bit-write penalty too...

But ya, again, I've never measured ;-)

--
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2012-01-07 00:15:25 patch: fix SSI finished list corruption
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-06 23:48:45 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2