Re: Deadlock detector fails to activate on a hot standby replica

From: JoongHyuk Shin <sjh910805(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deadlock detector fails to activate on a hot standby replica
Date: 2026-08-04 05:30:20
Message-ID: CACSdjfMBDtxiFyA3eEVNJRQi1rufPGEjXOtAQ3qQkVc-P=187w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 12:57 AM Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
> It seems, the patch should be completely rewritten. I will try to
> prepare a new patch version.

Hi Vitaly,

Any update on the new version you mentioned in your last message?

I ask because my patch at [1] reworks the same dispatch block in
ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin, and I plan to rebase it on top of
your rewrite, so I would like to time that.

Happy to help with testing if that is useful.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACSdjfO3ox8i8N3KxGf3HThzX1vnRRkY2kq1m5qsvGxjcuM1jg%40mail.gmail.com

--
JH Shin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2026-08-04 05:44:53 Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2026-08-04 05:25:52 Re: [PATCH v3] Don't stop a `vacuumdb/reindex/ --all` on a connection failure