From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft |
Date: | 2020-05-21 04:12:13 |
Message-ID: | CACPNZCuUGCmynNTP0br644-xJLPS6sQSQMh9paDFfaLa-548YA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Jon,
I noticed a couple minor inconsistencies:
".datetime" -> elsewhere functions are formatted as `.datetime()`
libpq -> `libpq`
The link to the release notes on its own line is the same as the
inline link, if that makes sense. In other places with links on their
own line, the full URL is in the link text.
Also, for "indexes that contain many repeat values", "repeated" might
sound better here. It's one of those things that jumped out at me at
first reading, but when trying both in my head, it seems ok.
Regarding "streaming `pg_basebackup`s", I'm used to the general term
"base backups" in this usage, which seems a distinct concept from the
name of the invoked command.
Thanks!
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Santhosh Kumar | 2020-05-21 05:03:14 | Behaviour of failed Primary |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-05-21 03:18:16 | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? |