Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Date: 2019-05-04 22:58:18
Message-ID: CACPNZCtCyKJ-ni1w0tC8PiDpqvvZDSwUygEcATxOn0L2cdok3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 5:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached is a revert patch. John, can you please once double-check to
> ensure I have not missed anything?

Looks complete to me.

--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-05-04 23:00:48 Re: Logging the feature of SQL-level read/write commits
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-04 22:38:05 Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay?