| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it>, psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2 |
| Date: | 2011-12-14 19:28:58 |
| Message-ID: | CACMqXC+f3Q6e4Y5p413GB1tPy977H0_XXHMhcfCd+S2Jevw29g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Daniele Varrazzo
<daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The only widespread use of a numeric value I've seen (including many
> official psycopg2 examples) is for autocommit=0, so when I've changed
> the values I've cared to keep that value stable only.
Please remove any kind of usage of plain ints from psycopg
test and example code, if you really want discourage such use.
db.set_isolation_level(0) quite strongly hints that other
numeric usage is valid too.
Esp. note the usage in lib/psycopg1.py that was not updated
with your previous changes.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2011-12-14 22:00:50 | Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2 |
| Previous Message | Federico Di Gregorio | 2011-12-14 16:17:23 | Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2 |