On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGQ_Tutorial
>
> PGQ looks promising, but I can't afford the risk of losing calls in
> the event that there are no workers to process them (the correct
> action is for them simply to languish in the database until one is
> started up).
PGQ does not lose events - after consumer registers
on the queue it is guaranteed to see all events.
So it's a matter of registering your consumers
before anything interesting happens in database.
The actual consumers do not need to be running
at that moment.
--
marko