Re: Global temporary tables

From: Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Global temporary tables
Date: 2026-06-26 03:51:53
Message-ID: CACLU5mTSDkxr7R9MpXqO8Fi-TL-V+JO_f4vQFMU92OhhDYTtww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 7:35 PM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 at 10:12, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > v3 attached, attempting to fix another issue reported by the cfbot --
> > need to tolerate relation_open() on a global temporary relation, when
> > in parallel mode because pg_get_viewdef() does that.
>
> Ugh, that still wasn't quite right. Here's v4 with more fixes for
> parallel workers.
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
+ 1 for the idea. I will try to review this over the weekend. We could
use this.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-06-26 04:10:57 Re: In core use of RegisterXactCallback() and RegisterSubXactCallback()
Previous Message Peter Smith 2026-06-26 03:43:57 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication