From: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Idea Feedback: psql \h misses -> Offers Links? |
Date: | 2024-04-18 21:29:14 |
Message-ID: | CACLU5mTBDOMHrKewyqUyYNXokpZ_mQVO3UfqMfeQCMt4NtVs_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:37 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 17.04.24 19:47, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> > *Example:*
> > \h current_setting
> > No help available for "current_setting".
> > Try \h with no arguments to see available help.
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F16%2F&q=current_setting
> > <https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F16%2F&q=current_setting>
>
> One problem is that this search URL does not actually produce any useful
> information about current_setting.
>
> I see what you mean, but doesn't that imply our web search feature is
weak? That's the full name of an existing function, and it's in the index.
But it cannot be found if searched from the website?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devulapalli, Raghuveer | 2024-04-18 21:29:55 | RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512 |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-04-18 21:22:10 | Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos |