Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Wait event timing and tracing instrumentation

From: Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Fomin <fomin(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, Ilmar Yunusov <tanswis42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Wait event timing and tracing instrumentation
Date: 2026-09-04 20:22:49
Message-ID: CACLU5mT4jUgko-nQb5TvrkEuj6+pPRoUOozSESk3Zp+7W-eXCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 3:23 PM Dmitry Fomin <fomin(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Hackers
>
> v6 is a rebase of v5 over current master (74c77052bc2); cfbot flagged
> the set as needing a rebase after about 400 commits of drift. One
> mechanical change beyond the rebase: master meanwhile added
> src/test/modules/test_misc/t/015_temp_schema_exit_deferrable.pl, so the
> injection-point seqlock TAP test moves from 015 to
> t/016_wait_event_trace_seqlock.pl. No code changes.
>
> The patches carry no catversion bump; one is needed at commit time for
> 0002, 0003 and 0006.
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry Fomin
>

Let me +1 this, as I believe this is incredibly useful.
Keep up the good work.

Kirk Out!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-09-04 20:51:07 Improve error message of FOR PORTION OF violations of WITH CHECK OPTION
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-09-04 20:21:33 Avoid evaluating FOR PORTION OF bounds more than once