Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2024-04-06 14:34:11
Message-ID: CACJufxHrucf2=0iVLa4RDor9KODew8_P5sOE8H9YqjPMGeuLjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:35 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:02 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'll post the rebased 0002 tomorrow after addressing your comments.
>
> Here's one. Main changes:
>
> * Fixed a bug in get_table_json_columns() which caused nested columns
> to be deparsed incorrectly, something Jian reported upthread.
> * Simplified the algorithm in JsonTablePlanNextRow()
>
> I'll post another revision or two maybe tomorrow, but posting what I
> have now in case Jian wants to do more testing.
>

+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * Parent and thus the plan has no more rows.
+ */
+ return false;
+ }
in JsonTablePlanNextRow, the above comment seems strange to me.

+ /*
+ * Re-evaluate a nested plan's row pattern using the new parent row
+ * pattern, if present.
+ */
+ Assert(parent != NULL);
+ if (!parent->current.isnull)
+ JsonTableResetRowPattern(planstate, parent->current.value);
Is this assertion useful?
if parent is null, then parent->current.isnull will cause segmentation fault.

I tested with 3 NESTED PATH, it works! (I didn't fully understand
JsonTablePlanNextRow though).
the doc needs some polish work.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-04-06 14:40:01 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-06 14:04:45 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?