From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE/ProcessUtility hook behavior change |
Date: | 2024-04-30 11:15:35 |
Message-ID: | CACJufxHUkC5cWDz2mmRTgoo9B=bRyxGLr=QyJ9KQNxeNkdvu0A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:35 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 4/30/24 12:57, jian he wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:26 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Since bb766cde cannot be readily applied to older commits in master I'm
> >> unable to continue bisecting to find the ALTER TABLE behavioral change.
> >>
> >> This seems to leave me with manual code inspection and there have been a
> >> lot of changes in this area, so I'm hoping somebody will know why this
> >> ALTER TABLE change happened before I start digging into it.
> >
I just tested these two commits.
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=3da13a6257bc08b1d402c83feb2a35450f988365
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=b0e96f311985bceba79825214f8e43f65afa653a
i think it's related to the catalog not null commit.
it will alter table and add not null constraint internally (equivalent
to `alter table test alter id set not null`).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-30 12:07:43 | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-04-30 10:59:11 | Re: partitioning and identity column |