| From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug |
| Date: | 2023-11-11 00:00:00 |
| Message-ID: | CACJufxGsB1ciahkNDccyxhw-Pfp_-_y+Wx+1BOdRyVVxKojAbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
looking around.
I found other three minor issues. attached.
I am not sure the pg_class "relam" description part is correct. since
partitioned indexes (relkind "I") also have the access method, but no
storage.
"
If this is a table or an index, the access method used (heap, B-tree,
hash, etc.); otherwise zero (zero occurs for sequences, as well as
relations without storage, such as views)
"
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| typesanity.diff | text/x-patch | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-11-11 00:03:16 | Why do indexes and sorts use the database collation? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-11-10 23:58:43 | Re: Force the old transactions logs cleanup even if checkpoint is skipped |