Re: speedup ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK CONSTRAINT.

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speedup ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK CONSTRAINT.
Date: 2024-12-03 06:43:00
Message-ID: CACJufxG1ouAv0PEeWxmrGaxnTLinMJuqEcYL=8D-cEYyZviL1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:06 AM Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Thanks for the patch, but I think using SPI is still not allowed here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9878.1511970441%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> > if it uses SPI for sub-operations of ALTER TABLE I think that is sufficient reason to reject it out of hand.
>

Thanks for dropping this link.
i wonder what was your thoughts about this
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/900056D1-32DF-4927-8251-3E0C0DC407FD%40anarazel.de)
at that time?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-03 06:46:50 Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-12-03 06:32:47 Re: [18] Unintentional behavior change in commit e9931bfb75