Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2024-01-31 10:15:00
Message-ID: CACJufxFrZS07oBHMk1_c8P3A84VZ3ysXiZV8NeU6gAnvu+HsVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:55 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> based on my understanding of
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/xoper-optimization.html#XOPER-COMMUTATOR
> I think you need move commutator check right after the `if
> (get_op_rettype(opno) != BOOLOID)` branch
>
I was wrong about this part. sorry for the noise.

I have made some changes (attachment).
* if the operator expression left or right side type category is
{array | domain | composite}, then don't do the transformation.
(i am not 10% sure with composite)

* if the left side of the operator expression node contains volatile
functions, then don't do the transformation.

* some other minor cosmetic changes.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v14_comments.no-cfbot application/octet-stream 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2024-01-31 10:16:34 Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-01-31 10:04:24 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?