From: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
Date: | 2024-01-31 10:16:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+VUV5q=za5MqBbXV-OKJc8ukyfQZQjoxSVKvUK4C1wL7gjm2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi there,
I very much like the idea of a file in the data directory that also
controls the copy operations.
Just wanted to highlight though that in our operator we have already
applied the read-only postgresql.auto.conf trick to disable the system (see
https://cloudnative-pg.io/documentation/current/postgresql_conf/#enabling-alter-system)
However, having that file read-only triggered an issue when using pg_rewind
to resync a former primary, as pg_rewind immediately bails out when a
read-only file is encountered in the PGDATA (see
https://github.com/cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg/issues/3698)
We might keep this in mind if we go down the path of the separate file.
Thanks,
Gabriele
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 08:43, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> On 31.01.24 06:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The idea of adding a file to the data directory appeals to me.
> >>
> >> optional_runtime_features.conf
> >> alter_system=enabled
> >> copy_from_program=enabled
> >> copy_to_program=disabled
> > ... so, exactly what keeps an uncooperative superuser from
> > overwriting that file?
>
> The point of this feature would be to keep the honest people honest.
>
> The first thing I did when ALTER SYSTEM came out however many years ago
> was to install Nagios checks to warn when postgresql.auto.conf exists.
> Because the thing is an attractive nuisance, especially when you want to
> do centralized configuration control. Of course you can bypass it using
> COPY PROGRAM etc., but then you *know* that you are *bypassing*
> something. If you just see ALTER SYSTEM, you'll think, "that is
> obviously the appropriate tool", and there is no generally accepted way
> to communicate that, in particular environment, it might not be.
>
>
--
Gabriele Bartolini
Vice President, Cloud Native at EDB
enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-01-31 10:37:22 | Re: Extending SMgrRelation lifetimes |
Previous Message | jian he | 2024-01-31 10:15:00 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |