| From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: refactor ExecInitPartitionInfo |
| Date: | 2026-04-01 13:12:54 |
| Message-ID: | CACJufxFX_pTuBnQKoDP56ChcRiYdN+54KZnf99vo7MqVWrXmYw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:28 AM Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > if (node != NULL)
> > part_attmap = build_attrmap_by_name(RelationGetDescr(partrel),
> > RelationGetDescr(firstResultRel),
> > false);
> >
> > We have now consolidated five uses of build_attrmap_by_name into one.
>
> Hm, why would that be ok? As far as I can tell the current code tries
> hard to not build the attmap unless it is actually needed while you
> propose to build it almost unconditionally. While the code is less
> complicated with your patch it instead has to do more work in some
> cases, right?
>
Ok. I switched it back to
+ if (node &&
+ (node->withCheckOptionLists != NIL ||
+ node->returningLists != NIL ||
+ node->onConflictAction == ONCONFLICT_UPDATE ||
+ node->onConflictWhere ||
+ node->operation == CMD_MERGE))
+ {
+ /* later map_variable_attnos need use attribute map, build it now */
+ part_attmap = build_attrmap_by_name(RelationGetDescr(partrel),
+ RelationGetDescr(firstResultRel),
+ false);
+ }
+
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-refactor-ExecInitPartitionInfo.patch | text/x-patch | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihail Nikalayeu | 2026-04-01 13:18:15 | Re: Online PostgreSQL version() updates |
| Previous Message | Pavlo Golub | 2026-04-01 12:49:05 | Re[2]: [PATCH] pg_stat_statements: add last_execution_start column |