Re: Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore
Date: 2026-03-09 08:15:42
Message-ID: CACJufxF66bykd6NSjLciiT87GxXKVSQAJOxmrKV=Emf8fz+pTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

Most of the code changes are very similar to
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=b2898baaf7e40a187de5b0134d53d944b38209cd
The change in pg_restore.c is more invasive, so I separated it from pg_dump.

--
jian
https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-pg_restore-Refactor-handling-of-conflicting-options.patch text/x-patch 8.7 KB
v2-0001-pg_dump-Refactor-handling-of-conflicting-options.patch text/x-patch 5.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-03-09 08:39:38 Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2026-03-09 08:10:13 Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD