From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump does not dump domain not-null constraint's comments |
Date: | 2025-05-08 04:59:02 |
Message-ID: | CACJufxEM5HMqfDDv7brOj3TA89LQremzrTs+hxKKSBWrMDHCEw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 10:56 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Ooh, you know what? I ran your the CREATE DOMAIN statement in your new
> test and pg_dump'ed that, and as far as I can tell the _name_ of the
> not-null constraint is not dumped either. So it's not just the comment
> that we're losing. That's a separate bug, and probably needs to be
> fixed first, although I'm not sure if that one is going to be
> back-patchable. Which means, I withdraw my earlier assessment that the
> comment fix is back-patchable as a whole.
>
for PG17. we change the dump of
create domain test.d4 as int constraint nn not null;
from
CREATE DOMAIN test.d4 AS integer NOT NULL;
to
CREATE DOMAIN test.d4 AS integer CONSTRAINT nn NOT NULL;
in PG17 we didn't preserve the constraint name, now if we did, then
it's a bug fix,
so it can be back-patchable?
Anyway, the attachment is for PG18 only now, it will fix the domain constraint
name loss and domain not-null comments loss issue together.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0002-sanitize-variable-or-argument-name-in-pg_dump.patch | text/x-patch | 4.0 KB |
v3-0001-Improve-pg_dump-handling-of-domain-not-null-constraints.patch | text/x-patch | 8.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-05-08 05:22:00 | Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-05-08 03:51:49 | Re: regdatabase |