Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: 2025-11-20 16:30:51
Message-ID: CACG=ezbDgXvgNcxMmiCNZR1g95CBT+Y2rVhZWa_1SuOWeFREDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 at 19:20, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

>
> I think those recipes need to be adjusted for 64-bit offsets.

Yes, we need to do it.

Sorry if this is too obvious, but with 32-bit offsets, we get:
SLRU_PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * BLKSZ / sizeof(MXOff) =
32 * 8192 / 4 = 65,536 mxoff per segment.

Now, with 64-bits offsets, we should have half as much.

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-11-20 16:34:14 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-11-20 16:25:37 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread