| From: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: don't see materialized views in information_schema |
| Date: | 2019-09-11 08:52:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAC+AXB2zmE3WcnqWh_ZsWh+D727ERAOMrKWvAH0x2hKLW4Y0Vg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:03 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> st 11. 9. 2019 v 9:49 odesílatel Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> napsal:
>>
>> On 2019-09-11 08:14, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > [matviews not showing up in information_schema.tables]
>> >
>> > Is it expected behave? Tested on master branch.
>>
>> I think it is; it has been like this all along.
>>
>> ( matviews are in pg_matviews. )
>
>
> Minimally I miss a entry in information_schema.views
>
> To today I expected so any object should be listed somewhere in information_schema.
>
There has been previous discussion about this topic:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3794.1412980686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-09-11 08:54:42 | Re: don't see materialized views in information_schema |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2019-09-11 08:32:33 | Re: Pulling up direct-correlated ANY_SUBLINK |