| From: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Doc] pg_restore documentation didn't explain how to use connection string |
| Date: | 2019-05-17 11:39:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAC+AXB0KR0E6wpxKPWJvGBn37=nscemV-uiPuX6VaoNJeHuhDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:28 PM Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I do really appreciate that you took the time and your point of view is
> valuable to me.
>
>
I did not see your original mail from the 30th, we were talking about
apples and oranges. Sorry for the noise.
I have gone though that original mail and the undocumented behaviour you
are seeing is from libpq itself, maybe not intentional at tool level.
So, if you want to resize your proposal to a more manageable scope breaking
it down at tool level might take you further, there you want to make sure
the behaviour is actually supported.
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Evan Macbeth | 2019-05-17 12:14:33 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-05-17 11:31:36 | postgres_fdw: oddity in costing presorted foreign scans with local stats |