From: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Bernier <robert(at)pg-live(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nice Quote from Celko |
Date: | 2012-09-24 21:15:51 |
Message-ID: | CABwTF4Uj6Kz=AHxmMcRoZTRh2q3bVsOVGnM9OvHJzGim+VMxOg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Robert Bernier <robert(at)pg-live(dot)info>wrote:
> On Saturday, September 22, 2012 01:54:08 pm Gavin Flower wrote:
> > On 23/09/12 03:31, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > >
> > > "Developers are more likely to port SQL Server to Postgres because it
> > > is open source, supports more ANSI features, runs on more platforms,
> > > uses a different ACID model and has a great optimizer. "
> > >
> > > http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/89991/
> > >
> > It wanted me to login to read it.
>
>
> Read it using elinks, that's what I did.
Well, I used wget on that link and was able to get the whole article, and
read it in my Firefox. I think sharing that HTML file here would be in
violation of their Terms of Use [1] , so can't share here.
Before the "Bottom Line" section, I got the feeling that Joe used reverse
psychology to show that Postgres is a better option in quite a few
circumstances.
I also posted a couple of corrections in discussion section (had to
register, though :), apart from what Richard had posted.
[1] http://www.sqlservercentral.com/About/Terms
--
Gurjeet Singh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2012-09-25 01:49:05 | Re: A few thoughts for further marketing |
Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2012-09-24 20:07:33 | Re: Nice Quote from Celko |