Re: Proposing pg_hibernate

From: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposing pg_hibernate
Date: 2014-06-06 11:04:29
Message-ID: CABwTF4UZrAZNu6jto6Ekz75mNK32AbvrGSaMMVj01e8dEP54uA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Another thing is don't you want to handle SIGQUIT signal in bg saver?

I think bgworker_quickdie registered in StartBackgroundWorker() serves
the purpose just fine.

Best regards,
--
Gurjeet Singh http://gurjeet.singh.im/

EDB www.EnterpriseDB.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message furuyao 2014-06-06 11:05:27 Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode
Previous Message Naoya Anzai 2014-06-06 08:41:53 "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed.