Re: Proposing pg_hibernate

From: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposing pg_hibernate
Date: 2014-05-29 11:52:56
Message-ID: CABwTF4UHKb7jnpPNeB0iJ63OX1GzzEoh0EsYE5K5FMfRd0ei+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 29, 2014 12:12 AM, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I agree with you that there are only few corner cases where evicting
> shared buffers by this utility would harm, but was wondering if we could
> even save those, say if it would only use available free buffers. I think
> currently there is no such interface and inventing a new interface for
this
> case doesn't seem to reasonable unless we see any other use case of
> such a interface.

+1

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2014-05-29 11:55:47 json/jsonb inconsistence
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2014-05-29 11:34:12 Jsonb: jbvBinary usage in the convertJsonbValue?