| From: | Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Welty, Richard" <rwelty(at)ltionline(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: current thinking on Amazon EC2? |
| Date: | 2012-03-19 20:30:37 |
| Message-ID: | CABs1bs2ZUV-P3qf55QiG+p9nvZ65ELwrTc-AQ=qTTX33t8ctpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Welty, Richard wrote:
>
> i just finished this thread from May of last year, and am wondering if this
> still represents consensus thinking about postgresql deployments in the EC2
> cloud:
>
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/amazon-ec2-td4368036.html
>
>
> Yes, I believe that still sums up the situation pretty well.
I've been running my site on RackSpace CloudServers (similar to EC2)
and have been getting pretty good performance, though I don't have
huge amounts of database load.
One advantage, though, is RackSpace allows for hybrid solutions so I
could potentially lease a dedicated server and continue to host my web
frontend servers on the cloud.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-19 20:34:35 | Re: usage of pg_get_functiondef() -- SQL state 42809 |
| Previous Message | david.sahagian | 2012-03-19 20:24:10 | usage of pg_get_functiondef() -- SQL state 42809 |