Re: When does Postgres cache query plans?

From: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: When does Postgres cache query plans?
Date: 2012-09-05 23:06:55
Message-ID: CABs1bs0N7==qWCxj7n7TBLRpm8Qoqv_cEtFU7Ai6GAUVDeZowA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm curious under what circumstances Postgres will cache an execution
>> plan for a query.
>
> If you're writing raw SQL, never. The assumption is that the
> application knows its usage pattern a lot better than the server does,
> and if the application is going to re-execute the same/similar statement
> a lot of times, the app ought to make use of a prepared statement for
> that.
>
> Some client-side code (such as the JDBC driver) will make use of
> prepared statements under the hood, so a lot depends on context.
> But sending plain SQL with PQexec() does not result in any cached plan.

Excellent, that's pretty much what I figured (and would expect)..

It seems SQL Server and Oracle have some weird caching behavior that's
hard to understand and/or predict.. Postgres also seems to be unique
in the fact it even has a PREPARE statement.. MS SQL and Oracle only
provide that feature through the API..

Mike

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2012-09-06 01:15:41 Re: regexp_matches question
Previous Message Sergio Basurto 2012-09-05 23:02:49 Re: regexp_matches question