From: | Joy Arulraj <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: C++ port of Postgres |
Date: | 2016-09-23 23:37:07 |
Message-ID: | CABgyVxCQ_g14T1vA6Q5P5=xZ51dv=HewM150KHUyW-pMo0gREQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi Christian -- Sorry about the delay. The patch is based on PG version
9.5.3.
The commit history of the repo should give a high-level idea of the changes
required in PG to support compilation by a C++ compiler. I presume that
Peter's patch would be easier to integrate into PG. In any case, I would be
very glad to see PostgreSQL support C++.
Regards.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Christian Convey <
christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Joy Arulraj <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Hi folks --
> >
> > We have ported Postgres over to the C++ language (C++11 standard).
> >
> > https://github.com/jarulraj/postgresql-cpp
> >
> > Our goal is to use certain features of the C++ language and its standard
> > library to simplify coding, improve code reuse, and avoid bugs. Peter's
> > article titled `Moving to C++` was a source of inspiration for us.
>
> Do you remember the particular commit of PG upon which you based this
> work? Or even better, are you able to post a patch which applies
> cleanly to PG's current HEAD?
>
> I ask because I'd like to compare your approach to the one Peter has
> posted, and I think that will be easier if I can use a common (or at
> least similar) baseline for the comparison.
>
> Kind regards,
> Christian
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Deven Phillips | 2016-09-24 00:33:11 | Re: jsonb_set for nested new item? |
Previous Message | Vitaly Burovoy | 2016-09-23 21:12:51 | Re: jsonb_set for nested new item? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-23 23:52:37 | Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-23 22:14:49 | Re: tbm_lossify causes "unbalanced" hashtables / bitmaps |