Re: C++ port of Postgres

From: Joy Arulraj <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu>
To: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: C++ port of Postgres
Date: 2016-09-23 23:37:07
Message-ID: CABgyVxCQ_g14T1vA6Q5P5=xZ51dv=HewM150KHUyW-pMo0gREQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi Christian -- Sorry about the delay. The patch is based on PG version
9.5.3.
The commit history of the repo should give a high-level idea of the changes
required in PG to support compilation by a C++ compiler. I presume that
Peter's patch would be easier to integrate into PG. In any case, I would be
very glad to see PostgreSQL support C++.

Regards.

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Christian Convey <
christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Joy Arulraj <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Hi folks --
> >
> > We have ported Postgres over to the C++ language (C++11 standard).
> >
> > https://github.com/jarulraj/postgresql-cpp
> >
> > Our goal is to use certain features of the C++ language and its standard
> > library to simplify coding, improve code reuse, and avoid bugs. Peter's
> > article titled `Moving to C++` was a source of inspiration for us.
>
> Do you remember the particular commit of PG upon which you based this
> work? Or even better, are you able to post a patch which applies
> cleanly to PG's current HEAD?
>
> I ask because I'd like to compare your approach to the one Peter has
> posted, and I think that will be easier if I can use a common (or at
> least similar) baseline for the comparison.
>
> Kind regards,
> Christian
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Deven Phillips 2016-09-24 00:33:11 Re: jsonb_set for nested new item?
Previous Message Vitaly Burovoy 2016-09-23 21:12:51 Re: jsonb_set for nested new item?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-23 23:52:37 Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-09-23 22:14:49 Re: tbm_lossify causes "unbalanced" hashtables / bitmaps