| From: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished |
| Date: | 2026-09-10 14:10:27 |
| Message-ID: | CABdArM7LhFa8SyoSSOcgvSZJeG82JLHk4KY_r+CAJQTBPz0S7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > ~~~
> >
> > Given that we are treating a detach-pending partition as an individual
> > table for publication decisions, the changes in patch-003 (pg19
> > regression) look correct to me. The changes in relcache.c correctly
> > treat the detach-pending partition as an individual table.
> >
>
> I haven't had a chance to reveiw 003 yet as 001 itself was
> problematic. Will review it tomorrow.
>
Here is a rebased version of 003 that applies independently on both
HEAD and pg19. This should make reviewing patch-003 separately easier.
--
Thanks,
Nisha
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2_003-0001-Fix-crash-on-UPDATE-or-DELETE-of-a-partition-.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Burd | 2026-09-10 14:10:30 | Re: Trying out <stdatomic.h> |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2026-09-10 14:07:02 | FOR PORTION OF code review |