Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-04-10 11:24:16
Message-ID: CABdArM6QxXatkGefTHy__HgaYHBvbKesffeXzT8Vn-kvcvGK4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 9:24 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Also fixed all pending doc comments.
>

Hi Dilip,
I’m planning to review/test the feature patches, but they don’t apply
cleanly on the latest HEAD. Could you please rebase them?

--
Thanks,
Nisha

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-04-10 11:31:38 Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
Previous Message vignesh C 2026-04-10 11:01:23 Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications