On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:00 PM Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi Nisha
>
> On 20/05/2026 09:09, Nisha Moond wrote:
> > For the describePublications (\dRp+) case, should we add an (sversion
> >> = 150000) guard around the new change, since it accesses
> > pg_publication_namespace, which is only available in PG15 and above?
> > Thoughts?
>
>
> I considered that in my first review, but since PG14 will be EOL'd by
> the time PG20 is shipped, I thought it wouldn't be necessary.
>
Okay, that makes sense.
--
Thanks,
Nisha