Re: BUG #18076: Consistently receiving Signal 7 and Signal 11 errors

From: Robert Sanford <wobbet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18076: Consistently receiving Signal 7 and Signal 11 errors
Date: 2023-08-30 20:44:16
Message-ID: CABa+nRti17psssFVfG3xLeyy-z45rFDF9y3ge+Qj47ub7kw=Vw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom,

Thanks for that! The symlink was the issue. I recreated the symlink and it
found everything. I started seeing some weird errors when running a simple
test but realized that they were actually bugs in my code!

Now I'm rerunning the full suite and am no longer getting the Signal 7 or
Signal 11. I'm hoping that the OS upgrade is making things work better but
that also worries me.

If (when?!?!) I am able to recreate the bug I'll get a stack trace.

rjsjr

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:19 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Robert Sanford <wobbet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The update dropped the mount point where the database was stored. I've
> > restored the mount point but now PostgreSQL can't find it.
> > It's looking for pg_tblspc/16392/PG_15_202209061 when that folder is
> > located instead on /datadrive/pgsql/PG_15_202209061.
>
> pg_tblspc/16392/PG_15_202209061 should be a symlink to wherever the
> tablespace really is. You could make that link by hand if it
> disappeared somehow, but I think you are probably misdiagnosing
> the problem. Shouldn't you be adding something to the system's
> list of mounts, instead?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Muhammad Ali Ansari 2023-08-30 22:12:54 Re: BUG #18075: configuration variable idle_session_timeout not working as expected
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-08-30 18:46:53 Re: Where Clause not being applied to all tables in a publication