From: | Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Boriss Mejias <bmejias(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | pgsql-women(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What we need to do |
Date: | 2018-04-23 14:51:18 |
Message-ID: | CAB_COdjRw-KkiEOUQPweS+hM0pgaTeVGZ63Lgg=gDVq+2tNunA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-women |
Hi Boriss,
>
> I understand that we agree that as an organization, we better work on this
> together, women and men. That was my first paragraph about. This seems to
> be
> kind of a consensus in the group, so I feel welcome to participate and
> contribute.
>
> More comments here below regarding the part where we disagree.
>
> Lætitia Avrot wrote on 12-04-18 13:48:
> > Hi Boriss
> >
> >
> > I think excluding men from certain activities can be positive in the
> goal of
> > making women feel welcomed. For instance: Women-only IRC/Slack
> channels can
> > be a good thing. Women-only Hackathon can also help in making women
> feel
> > welcomed.
> >
> >
> > I strongly disagree. I want everyone to feel welcome, whatever their
> gender is.
> > If you start creating little worlds without men, first you exclude
> people and
> > that's a negative message to give and then it's totally artificial as
> our world
> > is populated with both men and women.
>
> I understand your concern, and I know you don't have problems
> participating in a
> world with mostly men. I saw your presentation at FOSDEM and you didn't
> seem
> intimidated at all. But for some women, maybe it is better to give some
> steps in
> a community removing some of the barriers (fictionally, I agree), but as
> an
> intermediate step, not as a fake reality, nor as a goal.
>
> When I was in academia we often discussed the fact that so few women study
> informatics. A professor told us that their statistics (sorry I don't have
> them
> to confirm) showed that the percentage of women studying engineering was
> smaller
> if they were coming from a mixed-school, than from a girls-only school.
> Their
> conclusion was that women in a girls-only school didn't developed the idea
> that
> computers and science was a boy-thing, so they wouldn't be affected by
> that
> cliché when making a choice for their studies.
>
>
>
>
> > So if we feel there is a problem with with
> > women representation in our community, we need to find a solution
> together.
>
> Absolutely. I started reading "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg (I like it a
> lot by
> the way). She insists that this is something we have to work on together.
> She
> also tells some stories of her experience speaking and participating in
> women-only events, with very good results.
>
> Note that I'm not saying that creating women-only activities is the
> solution. I
> just feel we don't have to discard them a priori, because they seem to
> have a
> benefit for some women in the long run, as an intermediate step. I think
> we
> should evaluate this when there is a more concrete proposal.
>
> I understand better your point of view. It's against my faith that men and
women can live together without harming themselves but I know that
statistics show that it can be beneficial.
So here are my thoughts : we could discuss some women-only activities, but
not now. It's too soon and would send the wrong message. I'd prefer we
focus on what we could do together for now.
Cheers,
Lætitia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lætitia Avrot | 2018-04-23 14:59:49 | Re: What we need to do |
Previous Message | Boriss Mejias | 2018-04-17 22:57:34 | Re: What we need to do |