Re: What we need to do

From: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Boriss Mejias <bmejias(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: pgsql-women(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What we need to do
Date: 2018-04-23 14:51:18
Message-ID: CAB_COdjRw-KkiEOUQPweS+hM0pgaTeVGZ63Lgg=gDVq+2tNunA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-women

Hi Boriss,

>
> I understand that we agree that as an organization, we better work on this
> together, women and men. That was my first paragraph about. This seems to
> be
> kind of a consensus in the group, so I feel welcome to participate and
> contribute.
>
> More comments here below regarding the part where we disagree.
>
> Lætitia Avrot wrote on 12-04-18 13:48:
> > Hi Boriss
> >
> >
> > I think excluding men from certain activities can be positive in the
> goal of
> > making women feel welcomed. For instance: Women-only IRC/Slack
> channels can
> > be a good thing. Women-only Hackathon can also help in making women
> feel
> > welcomed.
> >
> >
> > I strongly disagree. I want everyone to feel welcome, whatever their
> gender is.
> > If you start creating little worlds without men, first you exclude
> people and
> > that's a negative message to give and then it's totally artificial as
> our world
> > is populated with both men and women.
>
> I understand your concern, and I know you don't have problems
> participating in a
> world with mostly men. I saw your presentation at FOSDEM and you didn't
> seem
> intimidated at all. But for some women, maybe it is better to give some
> steps in
> a community removing some of the barriers (fictionally, I agree), but as
> an
> intermediate step, not as a fake reality, nor as a goal.
>
> When I was in academia we often discussed the fact that so few women study
> informatics. A professor told us that their statistics (sorry I don't have
> them
> to confirm) showed that the percentage of women studying engineering was
> smaller
> if they were coming from a mixed-school, than from a girls-only school.
> Their
> conclusion was that women in a girls-only school didn't developed the idea
> that
> computers and science was a boy-thing, so they wouldn't be affected by
> that
> cliché when making a choice for their studies.
>
>
>
>
> > So if we feel there is a problem with with
> > women representation in our community, we need to find a solution
> together.
>
> Absolutely. I started reading "Lean In" by Sheryl Sandberg (I like it a
> lot by
> the way). She insists that this is something we have to work on together.
> She
> also tells some stories of her experience speaking and participating in
> women-only events, with very good results.
>
> Note that I'm not saying that creating women-only activities is the
> solution. I
> just feel we don't have to discard them a priori, because they seem to
> have a
> benefit for some women in the long run, as an intermediate step. I think
> we
> should evaluate this when there is a more concrete proposal.
>

> I understand better your point of view. It's against my faith that men and
women can live together without harming themselves but I know that
statistics show that it can be beneficial.

So here are my thoughts : we could discuss some women-only activities, but
not now. It's too soon and would send the wrong message. I'd prefer we
focus on what we could do together for now.

Cheers,

Lætitia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-women by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lætitia Avrot 2018-04-23 14:59:49 Re: What we need to do
Previous Message Boriss Mejias 2018-04-17 22:57:34 Re: What we need to do