| From: | Laetitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | GF <phabriz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding a pg_servername() function |
| Date: | 2023-08-10 07:06:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAB_COdhnETLz5r7VkAK8uziVJ_JnaR4MNS2Sub+vAKf9kjGPZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le mer. 9 août 2023 à 17:32, GF <phabriz(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> Would it be less problematic if the function were called pg_gethostname()?
> @Laetitia: why did you propose that name? maybe to avoid clashes with some
> extension out there?
>
>
I used that name to be kind of coherent with the inet_server_addr(), but I
see now how it is a bad decision and can add confusion and wrong
expectations. I think pg_gethostname() is better.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-08-10 07:24:28 | Re: Support "Right Semi Join" plan shapes |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-08-10 05:59:07 | Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss |