| From: | Haibo Yan <tristan(dot)yim(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimize UUID parse using SIMD |
| Date: | 2026-06-25 21:31:06 |
| Message-ID: | CABXr29GAXiSsD+Y2-kbCxOnmvfA=xp8yfW5HLEVmpDN42BMBwQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 11:28 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose the $subject.
>
> Since commit ec8719ccbfcd made hex_decode_safe() SIMD-aware, decoding
> a run of hex digits is now fast. The attached patch reuses
> hex_decode_safe() in the UUID input function to speed up parsing.
>
> We accept several textual forms of a UUID[1]. The fast path handles
> the common ones: 32 hex digits, the canonical 8x-4x-4x-4x-12x form
> (where "nx" means n hex digits), and either of those wrapped in
> braces. Otherwise, it falls back to the ordinary scalar UUID parse.
>
> I've benchmarked the parse speed using the following query:
>
> CREATE TEMP TABLE u AS SELECT gen_random_uuid()::text AS t FROM
> generate_series(1, 1000000);
> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, TIMING OFF) SELECT t::uuid FROM u;
>
> I compared the execution time of the second query, which measures
> uuid_in() alone, with/without SIMD optimization. Here are results (the
> median of 5 runs):
>
> HEAD: 208.879 ms
> Patched: 40.983 ms
>
> The improvements look promising to me. But in a realistic pipeline the
> parse is a small fraction of the work, so end-to-end gains could be
> much smaller.
>
> Feedback is very welcome.
>
> I may be missing something, but I wonder whether the fast path is relying
on
slightly different input semantics from the existing UUID parser.
In particular, hex_decode_safe() is not a strict “32 hex characters only”
decoder. It skips whitespace, which is fine for its existing callers, but I
don’t think UUID input should treat whitespace inside the UUID body as
ignorable. Also, since hex_decode_safe() returns void, the UUID fast path
cannot verify that exactly UUID_LEN bytes were produced.
So I think it would be safer either to pre-validate that the 32 source
characters are all hex digits before calling hex_decode_safe(), or to use a
UUID-specific strict hex decoder for this path. After that, a comment
explaining why hex_decode_safe() is safe here would make the invariant much
clearer.
Could you also add a few regression tests for invalid inputs that contain
whitespace inside otherwise fast-path-looking UUID strings? For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT 'a0eebc99 9c0b4ef8bb6d6bb9bd380a11'::uuid;
SELECT 'a0eebc999c0b4ef8bb6d6bb9bd380a1 '::uuid;
SELECT '{a0eebc999c0b4ef8bb6d6bb9bd380a1 }'::uuid;
SELECT 'a0eebc99-9c0b-4ef8-bb6d-6bb9bd380a1 '::uuid;
---------------------------------------------------------------
These should continue to be rejected in the same way as the scalar parser.
Regards,
Haibo
> Regards,
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/datatype-uuid.html#DATATYPE-UUID
>
> --
> Masahiko Sawada
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-06-25 21:35:44 | Re: bytea(uuid) missing proleakproof? |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-06-25 21:05:10 | Re: pg_stat_statements: Remove (errcode...) framing parentheses in erport(...) |