Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Date: 2011-11-02 17:16:03
Message-ID: CABV9wwNVfc6X=yQ17rXUCg7Z0QnPT52hneoX-HhszZnP4hPK2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
>
> [Moving to pgsql-general]
>
> On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
>> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
>> datetimes:
>> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>>
>> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions
>> built with integer datetimes?
>>
> I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> quite easily, though.
>

Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used
on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one.

Robert Treat
conjecture: xzilla.net
consulting: omniti.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-11-02 17:18:10 Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production?
Previous Message Benjamin Smith 2011-11-02 17:01:49 Recommendations for SSDs in production?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2011-11-02 17:19:03 Moderation on -general?
Previous Message Armin Gensmantel 2011-11-02 15:02:13 Delete File on your server