Re: port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT
Date: 2017-03-02 01:23:24
Message-ID: CABUevEzqHKOwwR86ov0q=JT-x8=GkFGXNf+gXUT6fRt1vnULmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2/28/17 08:57, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > It appears we need pandoc 1.13 to get the good output. This won't be
> > available until Debian stretch.
> >
> > So for PG10, I propose the attached revised patch which keeps using
> lynx
> > but uses xsltproc instead of jade.
> >
> >
> > It is available for people not using debian though? Might it be
> > worthwhile to make it dependent on the version of pandoc -- so use that
> > method if people have the newer pandoc and fall back to lynx if they
> don't?
>
> Well, this really only runs once every couple of months on borka and
> here or there for those building their own snapshot tarballs. I don't
> think we need to cater to a wide audience here. In fact, variety could
> be bad here: We don't want to find out that a tarball was rolled with
> the wrong variant.
>

Good point. Let 's just go for it then.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2017-03-02 01:25:23 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-02 01:11:30 Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions