Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
>> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Is there an argument for back-patching this?
>> >
>> >
>> > Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take
>> > your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
>>
>> I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom
>> and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you
>> decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?
>
>
> No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged
> with other things, but I will try to get too it soon.
>
> (This also includes considering Jeff's note)
>
>
I've applied a backpatch to 9.4. Prior to that pretty much the entire patch
is a conflict, so it would need a full rewrite.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/