Re: WIP: document the hook system

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: document the hook system
Date: 2021-01-17 13:53:10
Message-ID: CABUevEzjS73s17aTdt53rPr5OHjfmhEm9vTuUTAyq3mjUv5mNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:28 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-31 04:28, David Fetter wrote:
> > This could probably use a lot of filling in, but having it in the
> > actual documentation beats needing to know folklore even to know
> > that the capability is there.
>
> This patch seems quite short of a state where one could begin to
> evaluate it. Documenting the hooks better seems a worthwhile goal. I
> think the question is whether we can develop documentation that is
> genuinely useful by itself without studying the relevant source code.
> This submission does not address that question.

Even just having a list of available hooks would be a nice improvement though :)

But maybe it's something that belongs better in a README file instead,
since as you say it's unlikely to be properly useful without looking
at the source anyway. But just a list of hooks and a *very* high
overview of where each of them hooks in would definitely be useful to
have somewhere, I think. Having to find with "grep" whether there may
or may not exist a hook for approximately what it is you're looking
for is definitely a process to improve on.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-01-17 14:31:57 Re: list of extended statistics on psql
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2021-01-17 13:48:04 cgit view availabel