Re: TABLESPACE and directory for Foreign tables?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TABLESPACE and directory for Foreign tables?
Date: 2014-05-05 18:20:00
Message-ID: CABUevEzfV4rbmU2gP6R9OAhzgTZ9Fu4tgSK-WW=BNPiFATM9wg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> On 05/05/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> I'm working with the cstore_fdw project, which has an interesting
> >> property for an FDW: the FDW itself creates the files which make up the
> >> database. This raises a couple of questions:
> >
> >> 1) Do we want to establish a standard directory for FDWs which create
> >> files, such as $PGDATA/base/{database-oid}/fdw/ ? Or would we want to
> >> leave it up to each FDW to decide?
> >
> > I think we ought to vigorously discourage FDWs from storing any files
> > inside $PGDATA. This cannot lead to anything except grief. Just for
> > starters, what will operations such as pg_basebackup do with them?
>
> That was one advantage to putting them in PGDATA; you get a copy of the
> files with pg_basebackup. Of course, they don't replicate after that,
> but they potentially could, in the future, with Logical Streaming
> Replication.
>

Presumably they'd also be inconsistent? And as such not really useful
unless you actually shut the database down before you back it up (e.g.
don't use pg_basebackup)?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-05 18:22:07 Re: TABLESPACE and directory for Foreign tables?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-05-05 18:17:18 Re: TABLESPACE and directory for Foreign tables?