Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp
Date: 2016-11-08 11:30:35
Message-ID: CABUevEzY5CfCA1EKtmGTs9vxWMBE4+JzeCj8rA5AnGQ_-5FQ-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> Hi Magnus,
>
> On 11/7/16 2:07 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Michael Paquier
>> Indeed, giving the attached for REL9_6_STABLE. You could as well have
>> a test for pg_stat_tmp but honestly that's not worth it. One thing I
>> have noticed is that the patch does not use _tarWriteDir() for
>> pg_xlog. I think it should even if that's not addressing directly a
>> bug...
>>
>> Applied and backported, thanks. Backported to 9.4, as this is where that
>> exclusion code appeared.
>>
>
> I reviewed the three back-patches and they look sensible to me.

Thanks!

> I did not backport the tests, as we don't have the $node stuff available
>> in 9.5 and earlier.
>>
>
> That's unfortunate but the changes are pretty straightforward and the
> testing is as good as it was before...

Yeah, that's my thinking as well. It would be nice, but not worth the
effort.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-11-08 11:48:05 Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Previous Message David Steele 2016-11-08 11:28:03 Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp