From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2020-10-27 11:05:25 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzLJ6ORzdbAYR9ZbGRcRpP3TP95APcr6xRUOZFbbm0fGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:53 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:35:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2020-10-06 12:26, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I went with the name --no-instructions to have the same name for both
> > > initdb and pg_upgrade. The downside is that "no-instructions" also
> > > causes the scripts not to be written in pg_upgrade, which arguably is a
> > > different thing. We could go with "--no-instructions" and
> > > "--no-scripts", but that would leave the parameters different. I also
> > > considered "--no-next-step", but that one didn't quite have the right
> > > ring to me. I'm happy for other suggestions on the parameter names.
> >
> > What scripts are left after we remove the analyze script, as discussed
> in a
> > different thread?
>
> There is still delete_old_cluster.sh.
>
Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of, but I was looking for something
more generic than explicitly saying --no-delete-script.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-10-27 11:15:25 | Re: Internal key management system |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-10-27 11:00:33 | Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars |