Re: Basebackups reported as idle

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basebackups reported as idle
Date: 2017-12-29 16:00:11
Message-ID: CABUevEzK3ODuS-1tRUVrLZxoOaqQ=ZAswwkTUb7+RFaPsVxM6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> On 12/29/17 6:49 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 06:21:46PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Could you update the patch?
> >>
> >> I thought I had, but I can see now that email was a figment of my
> >> imagination :)
> >
> > I'll take that as a fragment instead. The patch as proposed looks good
> > to me. Thanks for sending an updated version.
>
> Looks good to me as well.
>

Thanks to both of you for the reviews. Backpatched and pushed!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-12-29 16:43:07 Re: plpgsql function startup-time improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-29 15:56:10 Possible hole in Windows directory restrictions?